
On August 2, 2022, a neighbor who had a pattern of repeatedly calling the police reported a noise disturbance. Law enforcement arrived, assessed the situation, and determined that a man was simply emotional. They were prepared to leave, but upon running a warrant check, they discovered a traffic bench warrant for a missed court date. Because the jail was not full that night, they arrested him.
The man was taken to the hospital for medical clearance, where a doctor discovered a cyst in his neck and forwarded the medical records to jail staff. The doctor’s report specifically stated that the cyst required further evaluation within two weeks.
On August 5, 2022, three days after his arrest, the man was charged with misdemeanor Domestic Violence Assault 4 (DV Assault 4)—a low-level offense that does not justify lengthy imprisonment. The court imposed a no-contact order between him and his wife, despite her never requesting it.
While held in the Clallam County Jail, the man was denied medical treatment for his cyst. His voice became hoarse, breathing became difficult, and his condition worsened. Due to the no-contact order, which he did not request and was unaware of, he was unable to contact his wife or his attorney.
In September 2022, the prosecutor contacted the man's wife and offered a plea deal of 5-6 years in prison—a grossly excessive punishment for a misdemeanor. The wife, recognizing a clear miscarriage of justice, refused to attend court in protest.
In November 2022, the judge dismissed the case, dropped the no-contact order, and ordered the man's release on November 1, 2022.
Upset by losing the case, the prosecutor ran downstairs to the Clallam County Jail and ordered that the man not be released for 72 hours. During this time, he filed new charges against him for violating the now-dismissed no-contact order.
The man remained unlawfully detained and was assigned a new public defender, replacing the original one.
In December 2022, the prosecutor offered a new plea deal—22 months in prison on fabricated witness tampering charges. The man wanted to go to trial but was promised he would be allowed visits with his wife and that with good time credit, he’d be released before Thanksgiving. Under this pressure, he accepted the deal.
He was sentenced in January 2023.
On the same day he was sentenced, the prosecutor filed a motion to modify his conditions of release—after the deal was signed and the man was already sentenced. New conditions were added, including:
Despite being allowed to call and write his wife, she was denied visitation rights under DOC "policy."
Meanwhile, his cyst remained untreated, and he began experiencing medical emergencies, including passing out and collapsing on the concrete floor.
After months of neglect, in August 2023, he was finally rushed to the hospital, where the cyst was removed. The doctor stated that:
Prison staff only acted after multiple medical emergencies, and only after his wife contacted the state Ombudsman, the ACLU, and the DOJ in a desperate attempt to get him medical care.
On November 21, 2023, he was scheduled to be released. He planned to return home to his wife and son.
However, the Department of Corrections (DOC) denied his home address, citing an unspecified “policy.” Instead of being allowed to return home, he was kept in prison for an additional seven months—until June 1, 2024.
Even after his eventual release, the DOC refused to grant him a housing voucher despite:
Instead, he was given a tent and a sleeping bag and told to be homeless for the remaining year of his community supervision.
From August 2, 2022, to June 1, 2025, this man’s life has been manipulated, controlled, and destroyed by corrupt Clallam County officials and the Washington State DOC.
Despite the clear violations of due process, human rights, and legal abuse, they continue to operate under the shield of “qualified immunity” and the abuse of “color of law.”
🚨 If you are not outraged, you are not paying attention. 🚨
The same disabled man applied for Aged, Blind, and Disabled (ABD) benefits at the DSHS office in Port Angeles while waiting for his federal disability benefits to be reinstated.
Despite submitting medical documentation proving his disability, the Clallam County DSHS staff refused to approve his benefits, leaving him homeless and destitute for nearly three months.
Desperate for help, the same man traveled to the DSHS office in Bremerton.
Within one week, his benefits were approved without issue.
This blatant discrepancy highlights a systemic failure—residents of Clallam County should not be forced to travel to another county just to receive the assistance they are legally entitled to.
🚨 Clallam County’s DSHS office is failing the very people they are funded by—taxpayers.
The same man and his wife went to the Clallam County Court to request that a judge order the DOC to allow him to return home.
When they attempted to file a motion to be heard, the court clerk refused to process it unless they provided a case number. Since no case was open for this request, they were forced to use the case number associated with his prior “tampering with a witness” charge—a charge that had already been dismissed and had originated simply because he and his wife had spoken on the phone.
On the day of his scheduled release, the prosecutor maliciously refiled charges and ran to the jail to prevent him from being freed.
After being told he would be released, he was devastated when he wasn’t. He went into shock, broke down crying, and was placed in a holding cell for three days.
During this time:
When the man was finally allowed to appear in court with his wife to request the DOC allow him to return home, the judge refused to act.
The man also attempted to explain that:
Despite these facts, the judge dismissed his objections and stated on record:
👉 "Charlee Commeree is still your attorney and will be until I dismiss him."
The man then asked if his wife could speak on his behalf.
🚨 The judge abruptly ended the session, stating, “We don’t have time for this.” 🚨
His motion to return home was never heard.
Additionally, the court improperly scheduled his 7.8 Motion to Modify Judgment and Sentence for that same day—without his readiness or consent.
Now forced to represent himself pro se, his attempts to address the motion have been stonewalled by a judge who continues to refuse to act.
This blatant mishandling and dismissal of his rights demonstrate a profound failure of justice in Clallam County.
📍 Clallam County Courthouse
📍 223 E 4th St, Port Angeles, WA 98362
📞 (360) 417-2000
The same man, an older and disabled individual, went to the Sequim Police Department to file a police report against someone who was endangering him. Given his age and disability, he took the threat seriously and sought law enforcement assistance.
However, instead of taking the report, the officer at the desk refused to document the complaint. Worse, the officer called the alleged perpetrator directly and joked with him.
The same man had no choice but to report in person because the Sequim Police Department had removed the online reporting feature from their website—a tool that had previously allowed for reports to be filed remotely.
Additionally, the officer who denied his report was someone he had encountered in a prior incident, raising serious concerns about bias. Given this conflict of interest, another officer should have been assigned to take the report to ensure fairness and impartiality.
Frustrated by the police department’s refusal to take his report, the man returned to the Sequim Police Department to file an official complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against Officer Martinez for denying him the right to file a police report.
However, instead of following proper procedure:
The officer dismissively stated:
👉 "I’m just going to send you the same letter I did before,"
🚨 Refusing to do her job and improperly passing responsibility to someone else.
This blatant denial of police protection, refusal to take a valid complaint, and failure to comply with ADA requirements demonstrates:
✔ Negligence in handling public safety concerns
✔ Potential bias in refusing to document threats against a disabled person
✔ Violation of federal disability laws by dismissing an ADA complaint without review
The Sequim Police Department’s failure to act not only denied this man justice but also put his safety at risk.
Example 4: Clallam County Jail Incident
A man was being held in the Clallam County Jail, awaiting his day in court. Under the law, he was innocent until proven guilty.
However, despite having a diagnosed mental illness, Clallam County jail staff refused to provide him with his prescribed medication.
His deteriorating condition was so concerning that another inmate took notice and pleaded with jail staff to give him his medication.
Instead of addressing the urgent medical issue:
🚨 A few days later, the man took his own life. 🚨
He was only 42 years old.
No one should die while awaiting trial.
This was not an accident. This was neglect, medical malpractice, and deliberate indifference to a man's life.
Example 5: Sequim Bay State Park Incident
A homeless and disabled man went to Sequim Bay State Park in Clallam County to camp for a few days while seeking permanent shelter.
However, instead of providing reasonable accommodation, a volunteer staff member took matters into their own hands and:
The Jefferson County ranger used a law that did not apply to the man as justification for expelling him.
🚨 What makes this especially alarming: 🚨
✔ Sequim Bay State Park is in Clallam County—yet a ranger from a different county (Dosewallips State Park in Jefferson County) was called in to execute the expulsion.
✔ This raises serious legal and jurisdictional concerns—a Clallam County official should have handled the matter, not an out-of-county ranger.
The man was given a notice stating he had the right to appeal the expulsion in district court.
However, when he attempted to exercise this right:
🚨 Expelling a disabled, homeless man without legal grounds and then refusing to process his appeal is a clear violation of due process and equal protection.
Washington State Parks are public land, not private property. Rangers do not have unlimited authority to deny access based on their own discretion—especially without legal justification.
This case exemplifies how officials manipulate laws to remove vulnerable individuals without accountability.
.
Example 7: Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC) Policy Concerns
The same man and his wife have repeatedly requested written clarification from the Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC) regarding a bizarre and unexplained policy:
🚨 DOC claims he can be at home during the day, but not at night. 🚨
This effectively imposes a partial no-contact order between the man and his wife—without any legal justification.
Despite multiple attempts to obtain written clarification:
This arbitrary restriction is concerning because:
✔ There is no RCW (Revised Code of Washington) or WAC (Washington Administrative Code) that supports this policy.
✔ No court has imposed such a condition.
✔ DOC made no effort to conduct a home inspection or contact the family as they had promised during his time in prison.
The man and his wife believe that this unwritten rule is not only unjustified but also harmful—placing unnecessary strain on a family already impacted by wrongful legal actions.
🚨 Why is DOC enforcing conditions that do not exist in law or court orders?
This policy raises serious concerns about DOC acting beyond its legal authority, imposing restrictions without accountability or explanation.
Example 7: Theft and Harassment at Clallam County Courthouse
On Friday, January 17, 2024, a man and his wife left his personal belongings in oversized bags on a bench outside the Clallam County Courthouse. The bags were in plain view of security cameras.
That morning, the man arrived at the courthouse before 11 a.m. to file a temporary restraining order (TRO) against a state employee who had been:
✔ Harassing him
✔ Imposing illegal conditions
✔ Forcing him into homelessness, despite having a home
His goal was to have the matter heard by a judge that afternoon at the 1 p.m. session.
Instead of allowing the man to file his TRO as a pro se litigant, the Superior Court clerk directed him to District Court and told him he needed to consult with an attorney.
After being denied access to the court, the man and his wife stepped outside—only to find that his bags had been stolen.
When they contacted the Port Angeles Police Department (PAPD) to report the theft, they were told:
🚨 The security camera that pointed directly at the bench was ‘offline.’ 🚨
✔ Despite multiple security cameras at the courthouse, police claimed they had no footage of the theft.
✔ The timing of this incident raises serious concerns about courthouse security and accountability.
✔ Was this a failure of security—or something more deliberate?
Shouldn’t an alleged camera failure that coincides with a theft on government property be investigated as a security breach?
To make matters worse, while the man's wife was speaking to police about the theft at a bus shelter outside the courthouse, a Clallam Transit bus driver began harassing her:
🚨 He repeatedly motioned to her and honked his horn.
🚨 When she informed him she wasn’t getting on the bus, he flung open the door and said:
👉 "Ma’am, if you’re not waiting for the bus or getting on, you can’t sit here."
When she later called Clallam Transit for clarification, a supervisor confirmed that the bus driver’s statement was incorrect.
✔ She had every right to sit at the bus shelter.
✔ The bus driver’s behavior was unnecessary and harassing.
🚨 A man attempting to file a restraining order was obstructed from doing so.
🚨 His personal belongings were stolen outside the courthouse while security cameras were "offline."
🚨 His wife was harassed for simply sitting at a bus stop.
These incidents reflect the deep-seated corruption and blatant disregard for citizens’ rights within Clallam County.
Example 8: Unlawful Imposition of Additional Conditions
Six months into a one-year community custody sentence, the Washington State Department of Corrections (DOC) arbitrarily imposed a new condition:
🚨 The man was forced to wear a GPS ankle bracelet for the remaining six months of his supervision. 🚨
This new restriction was never outlined in:
✔ His original Judgment and Sentence (J&S)
✔ Any court order
✔ Any RCW (Revised Code of Washington) that mandates GPS monitoring in his case
The DOC's actions constitute an illegal expansion of sentencing conditions without judicial approval—a clear violation of due process.
The DOC claims the authority to impose new conditions at will, bypassing:
✔ Judicial oversight
✔ The sentencing court's authority
✔ State law that governs sentencing conditions
This practice allows DOC to enforce arbitrary and invasive measures—such as GPS monitoring—without legal basis or accountability.
🚨 This is a blatant abuse of power that undermines civil rights and due process. 🚨
This was not a legal supervision tool—it was:
✔ A form of harassment and stalking by the state
✔ A punitive measure amounting to cruel and unusual punishment
✔ An attempt to exert unchecked control over a free citizen
The unchecked power to modify a person’s sentence after the fact is a dangerous precedent for government overreach. If DOC can unilaterally impose conditions never ordered by a judge, what prevents them from escalating beyond GPS tracking?
🚨 DOC must be held accountable for imposing illegal conditions without legal authority. 🚨
The separation of powers exists for a reason—sentencing is the role of the courts, not DOC officers acting without oversight.
This case demonstrates a serious civil rights violation and sets a disturbing precedent for future government overreach.
I believe that the implementation of a GPS ankle bracelet was not about lawful supervision but rather an invasive tactic to monitor and control my movements.
🚨 This device appears to have been used to track my location and interfere with my ability to exercise my rights, including:
✔ Filing a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO)
✔ Seeking corrections to my Judgment and Sentence (J&S), which remains stuck in the court’s Odyssey portal without a hearing date
When I visited the courthouse to address these legal matters, I observed several unusual occurrences:
✔ The courthouse security guard was not present in the front lobby at the time of my visit.
✔ Maintenance personnel were driving around the building at that same time.
✔ While I cannot confirm coordination, the timing of these events raises serious concerns about possible intentional obstructions.
Adding to these concerns, my personal belongings—including my sleeping bag and tent—were stolen from a bench directly outside the courthouse.
🚨 Key facts that make this highly suspicious:
✔ Homeless individuals in the area typically respect each other’s belongings.
✔ The security camera covering the bench was conveniently "offline" at the time of the theft.
This, combined with the unexplained delay of an emergency TRO filing, raises further concerns about systemic interference in my legal actions.
Despite the clear urgency and legal merit of my filings, I have faced:
✔ Consistent delays in processing court filings
✔ Denials of my rights to due process
✔ Barriers preventing me from addressing legal injustices
🚨 These experiences suggest possible coordination between the Department of Corrections, court clerks, and other local authorities to obstruct my legal efforts.
By stalling my access to court and creating additional obstacles, these delays risk time-barring my valid lawsuits.
🚨 Such tactics—whether intentional or the result of negligence—violate my constitutional rights and merit further investigation. 🚨
Retaliatory Actions and Intentional Obstructions
✔ The same man was accompanied weekly to the DOC office.
✔ He and his wife followed all instructions, attended check-ins, and tried to comply despite impossible conditions.
✔ Suddenly, without explanation, he was issued a restraining order against his own wife.
🚨 Then came the GPS ankle monitor. 🚨
When questioned about why the tracking device was placed on him, Lovell’s response was:
👉 "I want to see if your husband will be nicer to you."
🚨 What kind of reason is this for government surveillance and a no-contact order?
This is not law enforcement.
This is abuse of power.
images showing the impact of forced homelessness on his health.
This man was forced to live outside in the freezing cold, despite being disabled and in need of medical care. Instead of receiving proper housing, he was given nothing but a tent—a clear message that his suffering was intentional, not accidental.
📸 Look at the photos . These are not just words—this is the physical evidence.
His swollen, damaged ankle is proof of being forced to limp for miles, carrying everything he owns, with nowhere to go. The scars, swelling, and pain tell a story of neglect, cruelty, and deliberate mistreatment.
Instead of receiving proper housing, he was given nothing but a tent—a clear message that his suffering was intentional, not accidental.
📸 Look at the photos . These are not just words—this is the physical evidence.
His swollen, damaged ankle is proof of being forced to limp for miles, carrying everything he owns, with nowhere to go. The scars, swelling, and pain tell a story of neglect, cruelty, a
The same man was told by Todd Lovell that he could be home during the day but not at night.
❌ What logic is this?
✔ He was expected to leave shelter at night—the most dangerous time—and survive in freezing conditions.
✔ When asked for this in writing, Lovell refused.
We believe that everyone’s voice matters. If you’ve experienced something similar to what’s been shared on this page, we encourage you to reach out and share your story. Your experiences can help shed light on important issues and make a difference.
Please email us directly at clallamcorrupt@proton.me with your thoughts, experiences, or feedback. Your message will remain confidential and can support our mission to expose systemic issues and push for positive change.
Thank you for your support.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.